Sherrone Moore's Big Decision

Coach Moore is all smiles in '25

The biggest headline of the college football offseason was arguably when the Michigan Wolverines landed Bryce Underwood, the #1 recruit in the nation, to be their QB of the future. The biggest question then became: when does the future become the present? If I was Sherrone Moore, which I am not, I wouldn't handle the current Michigan quarterback competition any differently. Moore doesn't plan to name the starter, at least not publicly, until game week.

After a 2024 season in which the Wolverines basically didn't have a QB, Moore and his coaches have stocked the QB room with plenty of options. So why make a decision any sooner than necessary? The first game of the season isn't for another 2-1/2 weeks, and there's still plenty of practice and plenty of QB reps to go around. Besides, why give the teams on Michigan's schedule any advance notice of how to prepare for the Wolverines' offense?

If I had to speculate, or if I were Coach Moore, I'd guess that Mikey Keene takes the field with the starters when Michigan opens the season against New Mexico. But I'd also make sure that after a couple of series, Underwood will make his Michigan debut. It will be a great opportunity for Underwood to get his feet wet and experience major college football. The Lobos won't likely present much of a challenge.

For me, it's less about the New Mexico game than it is about the following week: Michigan travels to Oklahoma to take on the Sooners. Oklahoma may not be toughest team right now, but Memorial Stadium is a tough place to play against a solid defense. Handing the reins to Keene in Norman gives Michigan a chance to get off to a good start without putting too much pressure on their star freshman. Underwood will offer a change-of-pace off the bench as he would have vs New Mexico.

Should all go well against Oklahoma, I would not be surprised to see Underwood named the permanent starter by the time the Wolverines host Central Michigan. It's similar to how Jim Harbaugh integrated J.J. McCarthy into the Michigan offense while Cade McNamara was the veteran starter. Unlike that season, though, I would like to see Underwood take the reins from Keene before season's end. (You may recall how McNamara, a limited QB at best, was simply overwhelmed against Georgia in the National Semifinals. McCarthy didn't have enough experience at that point to provide any real boost off the bench.)

Michigan fans will be clamoring for Underwood, and rightfully so. When a player with that much talent arrives in town, you want to see him play. But Coach Moore is right to take a cautious approach. Taking half the snaps over the first two weeks will not hamper Underwood's development. In fact, by relieving the pressure on him to be the Savior in Week 1, Moore will allow Underwood to shine by season's end.

Knicks In Disarray

When news broke that the Knicks had fired Tom Thibodeau, it came as a shock... even if you consider that Thibodeau's future with the team had been debated for months. As is often the case whenever a coach is dismissed, stories of disfunction and disapproval leaked out for the world to see. But almost as quickly, the shock turned to ridicule. It appeared that the Knicks had fired their coach with no idea of who would replace him.

At times like this, it's important to remember that more than one thing can be true at once: the Knicks no longer wanted Thibodeau to be the coach. And they had no specific successor in mind. Like any team with a coaching vacancy, the Knicks will now go through the process of doing research on prospective hires, and conducting interviews with those they consider viable candidates.

Fortunately for the Knicks (and whoever becomes their next coach) the roster is full of talented players. The next coach will need to figure out how to make all that talent work, especially given some of their shortcomings. Maybe this is giving the Knicks too much credit, but it's also possible that they had always wanted to conduct a broad coaching search. Speak with different coaches who have different philosophies: different from Thibodeau, different from each other, maybe even different from what the Knicks' front office had in mind. After all, they are looking for someone who is able to take the current collection of parts and turn them into a championship team. They didn't think Thibodeau was the coach for that. Why not hear out as many other coaches as you can?

It also seems that most people have lost sight of one important fact: until Leon Rose holds a press conference to explain his search process, or introduces the Knicks' new coach, every single thing that has been written is a rumor. "Unidentified team source". "League insider". "Sports talk radio host looking to fill three hours a day".

That's not to say that anyone is lying, or that anyone is completely wrong. It's just that in this vacuum -- Knicks fire coach! Knicks ask permission to speak to other coaches! Knicks are denied! -- a lot of speculation happens. I agree that Thibodeau was the best Knicks coach in decades, but also agree that he had his limitations. I'm not willing to argue that the Knicks made the wrong choice until after they hire a new coach. Even then, it will be difficult to judge their success until next year's Eastern Conference Finals. Will the Knicks be there again? Or will Knicks' fans be pining for the "good old days" when Coach Thibs prowled the sidelines? Only time will tell.

The Old Man and the Heels

A Hall of Fame coach, once revered, is struggling. He is 73 years old, trying to adapt to modern football amidst whispers that the game has passed him by. Finally, once it has become clear that the situation has reached its nadir, the coach and the team part ways.

That's what happened to Mack Brown at North Carolina. But that story is eerily similar to how Bill Belichick left New England. So when rumors started flying that Belichick was interested in taking over the head coaching job at North Carolina, I was immediately skeptical. After all, what sense did that make? Swap one over-the-hill coach for another? 

Yet here we are: Bill Belichick, with zero head-coaching experience at the college level, has signed on to lead North Carolina. Serving as head coach of a power conference program in the NIL-Transfer Portal Era is hard work. Just ask Nick Saban, the GOAT himself, how he felt about doing that job in his 70s. The job is so complex these days, that two head coaches - Chip Kelly and Gus Malzahn - both left their head-coaching jobs to become assistants instead.

There are some coaches who have found success at both the NCAA and NFL levels. Notable examples are Pete Carroll and Jim Harbaugh. But both had extensive experience in the college and pro ranks before becoming champions. (It's also worth noting that upon winning a National Championship last year at Michigan, Harbaugh bolted right back to the NFL.)

But back to Belichick. What, exactly, does he offer North Carolina RIGHT NOW? Belichick's Patriots went 29-38 over his last 4 seasons, losing in their only playoff appearance. Clearly, the NFL was no longer enamored with him. Next year's top high school recruits would have been 11 years old the last time Belichick won a Super Bowl. How much pull do you think a man not known for his charisma will have in those living rooms? Many coaches complain that with the portal, recruiting has become a year-round job, on top of all the other responsibilities a head coach shoulders. How much appetite do you think a 72-year-old man will have for that recruiting trail? 

One saving grace might be that North Carolina is not Alabama. A new coach who wins 9 games and flirts with a playoff appearance is a lost season in Tuscaloosa. In Chapel Hill, that's considered winning. But North Carolina administrators, fans and boosters are expecting a lot from their $50 million investment. What happens when the Tar Heels don't immediately succeed? Belichick's prickly personality and adversarial relationship with the media are well known. In his Super Bowl days, that could have been considered charming. Winning covers a multitude of sins. Terse answers and a curmudgeonly vibe don't go over as well when you're 6-6.

I don't have high hopes for the Belichick Experiment at North Carolina. Upon being introduced, Belichick spoke about how he wants to create a "pro program" at Carolina. "I would say through my experience, what we did in terms of training, developing players, running pro systems, pro techniques." Except the Tar Heel players are not pros. They are 19- and 20-year old kids, prone to head-scratching decisions and behavior. There are just too many ways for a coach to fail, even before he ever takes the field. Recruiting players, both in high school and via the portal, then constructing a coaching staff around those players. In a world of infinite possibilities, the genius of Bill Belichick just might translate into a college football powerhouse. My guess is that the number-crunchers at North Carolina will eventually need to figure out how much of Belichick's contract they're willing to eat before starting over, yet again.

Feeling Fever-ish

Caitlin Clark is the biggest star in women's athletics, and some would say, among the biggest stars in all of sports. Her games with the Iowa Hawkeyes became appointment television. With much fanfare, and deservedly so, Clark was the #1 pick taken in the WNBA Draft. And now her new team, the Indiana Fever, has started the season 0-4, while Clark has looked at times frustrated and floundering. It doesn't have to be this way.

To be fair, the Fever are not a very good team. You don't get the #1 pick in back-to-back drafts by winning a lot of games. But as a reward for their mediocrity, the Fever were able to select Clark and Aliyah Boston, last year's top draft pick. Clark, an electric shooting guard, and Boston, a back-to-the-basket type center, should be a dynamic combination. But that hasn't been the case so far.

First and foremost, Head Coach Christie Sides needs to do a better job setting up the Fever's offense. Let Boston set high picks for Clark, over and over. Since it's Clark who always draws the other teams' best defenders, she needs help getting open. A Boston screen either gets Clark a good look from deep, or gives Boston a free lane to the basket. Clark, who also led the country in assists at Iowa, is as good a passer as she is a shooter. I know there hasn't been much practice time since the season started, but creating the two-player game with Clark and Boston is essential for Indiana's success.

Sides, though, doesn't shoulder all the blame. I've seen time and again Fever players fail to even look for Clark, then drive to the basket or hoist up a tough shot. Last year's leading scorers -- Kelsey Mitchell and Nalyssa Smith -- have not only seen their scoring dip this season, but their shooting percentages have fallen, too. With Clark and Boston drawing so much attention, that shouldn't happen. Also, GET CLARK THE BALL. Yes, that would require the rest of the team to quash their egos, but as the saying goes, there's no I in Team.

It's still early. The WNBA season is only a couple of weeks old, as is Caitlin Clarks' professional career. She'll need time to adapt. And it's not easy, game after game, having to face the best defenders in the league (any one of whom is probably light year's better than the college players tasked to guard Clark at Iowa). But you don't set all-time NCAA records by not being really good, either. Clark is going to shine. I just hope the Fever figure out how to make it happen, soon.

The Bronx Bummers

Bill Parcells once famously said that you are what your record says you are. So while the Yankees talk constantly about their "championship caliber roster", their record very much says otherwise. Following another humiliating defeat at the hands of the Chicago White Sox, the Yankees sit in last place in the A.L. East and 5 games out of the final Wildcard slot.

Their record sits at 59-56, on a pace for a lowly 83 wins. Should that happen, it would be New York's lowest full-season win total since 1992. Optimistic fans would say that this team can turn it around, that the '23 Yanks haven't played their best baseball. But a deeper dive into the numbers is even more bleak. 

While the Yankees have played considerably better at home this season (.555 at Yankee Stadium, .461 on the road, pretty standard in MLB), they unfortunately play 29 of their final 47 games away from home. If the Yanks more or less match their season-long splits, the math says they'll go 23-24 the rest of the way. Add it all up, and the 2023 Yankees would finish 82-80.

That may sound terrible, and it is, but it's not surprising when you look at this team with an even longer lens. Over their last 200 games played, the Yankees are a pedestrian 100-100. They are what their record says they are.

Thank You for Your Service

With the announcement that Carmelo Anthony had retired from the NBA, many of his former teams and teammates offered well-wishes and congratulations on a Hall-of-Fame career. A prolific offensive force, Melo finished as the NBA's 9th all-time leading scorer.

Among the many accolades Anthony has received, is the repeated notion that the Knicks should retire his number. Please place me squarely in the opposite camp: as much as Anthony was the star attraction during his time in New York, the Knicks are under no obligation to hang his #7 jersey from the MSG rafters.

For one, the Knicks are not the Yankees. For the past decade or so, the main criteria for getting your number retired in the Bronx seems to be "He was a pretty popular player over the portion of his career that he played in New York."  (I'm looking at you, Paul O'Neill.) The Knicks have been far more discerning, having last retired a number in 2003 for a true franchise legend, Patrick Ewing.

There are several factors, for me, that work against Anthony. The Knicks didn't draft him, and Anthony was a Denver Nuggets star for nearly eight years before finagling a trade to the Knicks. In fact, only 7 of his 19 seasons were spent in a Knicks' uniform. By comparison, Earl "the Pearl" Monroe didn't enter the league as a Knick, but he spent the majority of his career in New York and retired in a Knicks' jersey.

Due to his relatively short time in orange-and-blue, Melo doesn't own any Knicks' career records. Anthony's 24.7 PPG is the third-best mark in franchise history, but he's only 7th on the Knicks' scoring list. He's 3rd all-time in 3-pointers made, but that's largely due to the era in which he played. Also, unlike a Ewing or Walt Frazier, Anthony's contributions were largely in the scoring column. 

Lastly, Anthony never won a championship in New York. In fact, Melo's teams only made the playoffs 3 times, and never advanced beyond the conference semis. This is probably less of a knock on Carmelo than the franchise itself, but for a one-dimensional, non-Knick-lifer, something needs to put you over the top for a jersey retirement ceremony. The stats from Mark Messier's time in Edmonton might dwarf his numbers with the Rangers, but no one will ever forget the 1994 champions. Messier is a Ranger for life.

I wouldn't be surprised if the Knicks held a Carmelo Anthony Night next season. He would certainly deserve the recognition for his time with the Knicks. But I'd be disappointed in Knicks' management (and ownership) if the night consisted of much more than a highlight reel, a plaque and a rousing ovation.

Fly the Frugal Skies

Economy-class Billionaire

Every so often, you come across a story that is both entirely meaningless and maddeningly stupid. News that the Yankees do not pay for in-flight Wi-Fi on the team's plane is one of those stories. 

On one hand, this was not an anonymous leak by a disgruntled player so I doubt anyone is really broken up about it. A bunch of multi-millionaires can certainly afford $9 per flight to post selfies on Instagram. 

On the other hand, SERIOUSLY YANKEES?

Reportedly, an in-flight Wi-Fi plan costs approximately $40,000 per year for the team. Let's put that cost into some ludicrous perspective:

• The Yankees' payroll in 2023 is expected to be $272 million
• $40,000 would add a bit more than 1/100 of 1% to that total (0.0147%)
• Forbes estimates the value of the Yankees franchise at $6 billion, with annual revenues of $482 million
• $40,000 is a bit less than 1/100 of 1% of that annual total (0.0083%)
• It would cost someone earning $100,000 the equivalent of $8.30 to pay for Wi-Fi annually
• A single season ticket on the Field MVP level (lower tier, wrapping around home plate) costs up to $18,079
• Aaron Judge's new contract pays him approximately $246,000 per game, or around $27,000 per inning

Remember, these are not casual flyers. Between all the road trips to the West coast and everywhere in between, the Yankees spend a lot of time in the air over the course of a season. It's not the end of the world, but not springing for Wi-Fi on the team's plane seems like an incredible oversight at best, and a really cheap move at worst. When viewed against their massive team revenues, it would almost literally cost them nothing.

Naturally, GM Brian Cashman had to chime in with the obviously true but still tone-deaf sentiment: "I think most of our players can afford it."

As Clear As Mud

Over the past few years, "Harbaugh to the NFL" has become as much a part of the college football post-season as Dr. Pepper. During the early stretch of Harbaugh's Michigan tenure, it was mostly about his failures. The typical Michigan fan, at that time, would have paid to help him move. But as Michigan's fortunes have improved -- back-to-back wins over Ohio State and spots in the College Football Playoffs -- so, too, have Harbaugh's NFL prospects improved.

After flirting with the Minnesota Vikings last year -- depending on who you talk to, it was either an interview he didn't get, or a nice conversation -- the rumor mill has started again. Harbaugh has been attached to the Denver Broncos and Carolina Panthers in recent days. Amidst all this swirl, though, one voice was absent. The one voice that could put to rest all the speculation.

On Wednesday, the Coach finally spoke:

“Although no one knows the future, I think I will be coaching Michigan next year.”

Thanks, Jim, that certainly settles matters. Or, read another way: "If no NFL team offers me a job, I will be back in Ann Arbor."

While this idle speculation is mostly fun and games for the media, it doesn't come without a cost. Harbaugh returning to Michigan is all well and good, but one group appears to be considerably less enthusiastic about the coach's constant waffling: top recruits. 

Nothing says "Come join our football program" quite like the constant rumors that the coach recruiting you will soon be working on Sundays instead. Is it a coincidence that coming off their best season in decades and another appearance in the CFP that Michigan's ranking for the 2023 Recruiting Class has plummeted to #17? 

For the 2023 class, not a single 5-star prospect decided to commit to the next 3 to 4 years under maybe? Coach Harbaugh. If the coach can't commit, how can you blame a recruit? You can bet Nick Saban is selling Nick Saban as much as he's selling Alabama. What is Harbaugh's answer in those living rooms when the "Are you going to the NFL" question inevitably arises? 

This is not to say that Harbaugh's equivocation is the sole reason for Michigan's recruiting struggles. In the immediate term, Michigan's haul of the 4th-ranked group of transfers will boost the 2023 team even more than some talented freshmen. But it would be nicer to have both.

Jim Harbaugh is gonna Jim Harbaugh, and that applies to any team that employs him. For years, it seemed like Michigan only got the nonsense part. Now they have the success, too. Unfortunately, it just seems harder to buy into the rah-rah-Michigan-Man act when his true desire seems to be a return to "the league where they play... for pay."

Everyone Wants an Uncle Steve

Image courtesy ESPN

Not a single pitch has been thrown in the 2023 baseball season, but that's not to say people aren't already keeping score. As impressive as the New York Mets have already been this off-season -- adding free agents Justin Verlander, Jose Quintana, Kodai Senga and David Robertson, plus re-signing Brandon Nimmo -- deep-pocketed owner Steve Cohen wasn't quite finished. The baseball world awoke this morning to the shocking news that Carlos Correa would add another $315 million to the Mets' league-leading payroll. The San Francisco Giants had hesitated too long, and Uncle Steve swooped in.

For as long as anyone can remember, or at least as long as George Steinbrenner had been throwing money around in the Bronx, fans have complained about the Yankees buying the pennant. (In recent years, though, no amount of Yankees' largesse has brought home a title.) It's ironic, then, that the Mets' fan base is so loudly cheering their own good fortune in the form of the fortunes of Steve Cohen. And the Mets are not making any apologies about spending whatever it takes to win.

While no roster is perfect, I can't recall a team in recent memory with such an abundance of top-level performers throughout:

• A starting rotation that features Max Scherzer, Verlander, Quintana, Senga and Carlos Carrasco
• A lineup of Correa, All-Stars Pete Alonso, Jeff McNeil, Starling Marte, plus SS Francisco Lindor
• A bullpen with Reliever of the Year Edwin Diaz and newly-signed set-up man Robertson

As the cliché goes, the games aren't played on paper. The Mets, for all the star power they have amassed, haven't won anything yet. Even regular season success will not define the 2023 Mets, as this team is built to win the World Series, right now. (Just ask the Dodgers how they feel about winning 111 games in the regular season, only to fall in the NLDS.)

But since it's only December, the most "winning" team in baseball thus far makes its home in Flushing, Queens. Uncle Steve has made this a Christmas season to remember for Mets' fans everywhere.

Guessing Game

Tomorrow night marks the first CFP rankings of the 2022 season. While there is always great anticipation around the first announcement, it ultimately means very little. In fact, it often seems that the committee is hedging their bets until the teams settle matters on the field. To wit, most would consider Tuesday night's first rankings to look like some variation of this:

1. Georgia
2. Ohio State
3. Tennessee
4. Michigan

With all four teams unbeaten and playing well, few would argue with those selections. But a closer look tells us that it would be nearly impossible for the final rankings to end up the same. 

"The Game of the Year" will be played this Saturday, and either Georgia or Tennessee will knock the other from the unbeaten ranks. Not to be outdone, all signs point to Michigan and Ohio State bringing 11-0 records to their clash at the end of November. The losers of those contests, with 1-loss and not eligible for their conference's championship game, would need plenty of help to finish among the final four.

That's not to say the committee's job will be easy. In fact, the CFP leadership may find themselves faced with the following scenario:

• Alabama wins out, finishes 11-1 and captures the SEC West
• Georgia beats Tennessee and finishes 12-0, winning the SEC East
• If Alabama beats Georgia, a 1-loss SEC Champ is almost guaranteed a spot in the playoffs
• If Georgia, previously ranked #1, has only 1 loss in the championship game, they make a strong case for inclusion
• Meanwhile, the 1-loss Volunteers, having BEATEN Alabama and whose only loss would be to former #1 Georgia, would be the odd team out

You could also end up with another logjam if the above scenario plays out AND both Clemson and TCU finish unbeaten. Clemson would probably land at #3, while TCU and the Big 12 may find themselves on the outside looking in.

Of course, there are lots of games to be played between now and the committee's final rankings in December. Attempting to predict how a group of 19- and 20-year-olds will perform on any given Saturday is an easy way to lose all your money. But that's not to say we won't be watching, and speculating, the whole time.

Of Streaks and Swoons

No team in baseball had a better start to the 2022 season than the New York Yankees. In fact, after going 22-6 in June -- an amazing .786 winning percentage -- the Yanks' record stood at 56-21. Talk then turned to history: at that pace, a team that played .727 baseball would be projected to finish with 117 wins, the most ever in baseball. What a difference a few weeks make.

This past weekend, the Yankees were swept in a series for the first time this season, losing all 3 games to the St. Louis Cardinals. But that was only the icing on a very bad cake. In a stark contrast to their electric start, the Yankees have limped through the opening weeks of the 2nd half. Over the past 30 games, the Yankees are a woeful 12-18, including their first 5-game losing streak.

So what does this all mean? As the expression goes, "You're never as good as you look when you're winning, and you're never as bad as you look when you're losing." The 2022 Yankees, therefore, aren't going to win 117 games, but they're not likely to finish .500 either. 

Thanks to their historic start, the Yankees are still a virtual lock to make the playoffs. Their hold on the best record in the league, though, is tenuous. Fortunately for the Yanks, Houston has been scuffling, too. Otherwise the Astros would have passed the Yankees already. All that said, it doesn't seem like it's time to panic, but context is quite important here.

Say that instead of winning 56 games by July, the Yankees started the first 30 games of the season the way they've played of late. At 12-18 on May 4, that would have been good enough for 4th place in the A.L. East. Very few people would figure that team to win 22 games in a calendar month. 

The case could be made that the Yankees' current swoon impacted their moves at the trade deadline more than their hot start. They reinforced the lineup with Andrew Benintendi, and the rotation with Frankie Montas, both newly-apparent areas of need. Unfortunately, both players have blended seamlessly with their now cold-as-ice teammates. Benintendi is an abysmal 4-30 since donning pinstripes, while Montas got bombed in his first start for New York.

Where do they go from here? A trip to Seattle is up next, where the Yanks will face the one who got away, Luis Castillo. And though the Red Sox have been lost all season, one can imagine how they would relish playing the role of spoiler in a weekend series at Fenway. 

Beyond that, though, could be the stretch that defines the entire season: 9 straight games against the Rays, Blue Jays and Mets, all teams currently in playoff position. If the Yankees can't right the ship by then, even a division lead could be in jeopardy. It remains to be seen which Yankees team will show up over the next few weeks. 

Dispatches from the Trade Deadline

To Live and Die in L.A.

To no one's surprise, Joey Gallo was finally put out of his misery and traded by the Yankees. A certified disaster in pinstripes, Gallo likely had no shortage of fans willing to drive him to the airport, lest he miss his flight to Los Angeles. But before we pull the plug entirely on Gallo, there may be a ray of hope waiting for him in Chavez Ravine.

Let's turn our attention to another big-ticket slugger whose career had seemingly come to an end last season: Albert Pujols. Waived by the Angels in May after a rocky tenure in Anaheim, Pujols quickly latched on with L.A.'s marquee residents, the Dodgers. Used strategically as a pinch-hitter and part-time starter, Pujols found new life. With the Dodgers, Pujols raised his average nearly 60 points and posted his best OPS since the early days in Anaheim. 

Certainly Gallo wouldn't face the pressure he did in New York. If used in a similar fashion as Pujols, could Gallo rebound into a passable major league hitter? Or even regain his form as a fearsome slugger? The Dodgers would like to think that.

Rock Chalk, Yankees

The MLB Trade Deadline is its own cottage industry, as every pundit churns out a constant stream of potential trades and hot gossip. With so much content generated, there is bound to be overlap, and thereby, consensus. This year, the chalk said that the Yanks needed help in the outfield and in the starting rotation. Andrew Benintendi was the agreed upon bat, while Luis Castillo was the most coveted arm. Once Castillo was off the board, though, all Twitter fingers pointed to Frankie Montas. What say you, Brian Cashman? "Done and done."

Both are solid deals and significant upgrades, even if everyone knew the trades were coming. There is nothing inherently wrong with making the pre-ordained trade. If everyone says it will happen, that's probably because there's a need to be filled. 

Last season, though, anyone with a passing interest in baseball and an internet connection had the aforementioned Gallo ticketed for the Bronx. They were right. And you saw how that turned out. 

But the Yankees also made a trade few saw coming: adding another left-handed bat in the form of Anthony Rizzo. He contributed far more down the stretch than Gallo, even if few pundits had predicted it.

All that is a way of saying that it's now up to the players to perform. Will Benintendi be a Gallo or a Rizzo? Under the bright lights of Broadway, will Montas remind us more of David Cone than Sonny Gray? The next few months will tell that story. It will also tell us if Cashman's moves were as smart as they were obvious.

The Theory of Relativity

Speaking of pundits, few had the Mariners on their list of suitors for Castillo. Once that deal was done, many wondered if Seattle had given up too much for the All-Star righty. But to me, trade value is largely relative. What one team feels is too much to pay for an elite starter might be worth it for another. Case in point: the Mariners. 

Owners of the longest playoff drought in baseball, the Mariners pushed all their chips to the center and bet big on Castillo. We all remember what deadline-day stars Verlander, Sabathia and Scherzer did, performing at an elite level and leading their new teams to the playoffs. If Castillo does the same for Seattle, a playoff appearance will mean much more to this team and their fans than whatever those prospects do in 3 or 4 years.

I Find Your Lack of Faith Disturbing

Is April 11th too early to start questioning the moves the Yankees made in the off-season? If not, is three games too soon to send mixed signals to a player who should be an integral part of your season? Does anyone really need a day off by Game 4?

While the Yankees were impressive over the weekend, taking 2 of 3 from the rival Red Sox, the opening week of the season provides no respite. Ahead of tonight's game against Toronto, manager Aaron Boone released the following lineup:

Worth noting are two items highlighted in red. The first has D.J. LeMahieu leading off, supplanting this weekend's lead-off hitter, Josh Donaldson. It was an interesting choice, using the power-hitting Donaldson as a lead-off batter. LeMahieu, on the other hand, has been used primarily as the #1 batter in the lineup so that makes sense. That said, does Donaldson need a day off already, against his former team, no less?

More puzzling, perhaps, is the insertion of utility-man Marwin Gonzalez at shortstop. Gonzalez played well in the spring, and certainly deserves an opportunity to play. Unfortunately, Gonzalez sees the field at the direct expense of the new Yankees shortstop, Isiah Kiner-Falefa. 

Perhaps I'm reading into this too much, but a 3-game sample size is a bit small to be sending a vote of no-confidence to your (ostensibly) starting shortstop. Kiner-Falefa wasn't great against Boston, managing only a single hit in 11 at-bats. But that's hardly worth a trip to the bench in Week 1 of a very long baseball season.

Back to Donaldson. Day off or otherwise, with Donaldson out of the lineup, it underscores the very basic problem with the makeup of the 2022 Yankees: they have lots of guys at DH. Whether it's Stanton, an adventure in the outfield, or LeMahieu, a man without a position, or Donaldson, a 3B by trade but not necessarily in practice, Boone must play a daily game of musical chairs with his lineup. 

One vitally important note about that practice, that even the most novice fantasy baseball players can tell you: if you have a guy who isn't in the lineup every day, there's probably a better player somewhere else who could take his place. (I don't see Juan Soto sitting out too many games for Yadiel Hernandez.) While it affords Boone some flexibility to have super-subs like LeMaheiu and Gonzalez to deploy on a nightly basis, it also means that someone else is NOT going to play. On certain nights, with Stanton in the outfield, or with Kiner-Falefa out of the lineup, the Yankee defense may suffer. 

Baseball is great because over the course of 162 games, any and all conjectures will either be borne out or disproven. Statistics will ultimately write the story: games played, runs produced, games won. Yet even then, the post-season awaits those teams good enough to qualify. And as is often the case, a team built to withstand 162 games -- malleable lineups, with subs available up and down -- is not necessarily the team built to win a short playoff series. But we'll have to wait until October before we start complaining about that.

The Rocket Man Fizzles Out

"Brian McNamee? Um, who?"

To almost no one's surprise, the 2022 Baseball Hall of Fame induction class was announced and Roger Clemens wasn't on the list. Along with Barry Bonds, Clemens has served as the poster-boy for the Steroid Era in baseball. Neither superstar had been able to crack the 75% barrier over the past 10 years, and with this last ballot, both fall short.

Much has been written over the years about Clemens, Bonds, steroids and the Hall. But this year, their last year of eligibility, has seen a slew of articles lamenting other writers' collective stance on accused steroid users. One even wrote that it would be a failure of the Hall of Fame if Bonds wasn't inducted.

But I'm not here to talk about Bonds. This is a Clemens story. Specifically, a story about how the voters got it right. That while Roger Clemens was one of the most dominant pitchers in baseball in the late '80s, by 1996 his skills had diminished.

In order to put everything into perspective, one first needs to understand just how dominant Clemens was in his prime. Here are some of the mind-blowing stats Clemens put up between 1986 and 1992:

• Three Cy Young awards
• 2.66 ERA
• 1.09 WHIP
• 136-63 record (.683 win %)
• Averaged 257 IP and 239 K's
• Led the AL in ERA four times
• Led the AL in K's twice

But starting in 1993, the Rocket began to fade. To be clear: this wasn't a blip or an aberration. This was a steady and consistent decline from the level of excellence he'd established. From' 93 to '96, Clemens was no longer the best pitcher in baseball:

• ERA jumped more than a full run to 3.77
• WHIP rose to 1.29
• Two losing seasons, and a record of 40-39
• Averaged only 186 IP, over a 70-inning drop

By the end of the '96 season, fans were wondering if Clemens had pitched his last game in Boston. He had. But then a funny thing happened. Roger Clemens, age 31 and trending downward, got better. And not just a little better.

In his two seasons in Toronto, Clemens was even more dominant than he was in Boston. Back-to-back Cy Young awards. Leading the league in Wins, ERA and strikeouts. Almost 500 innings pitched in just two seasons. It was a remarkable turnaround. But eventually, we all understood how it had happened. 

Roger Clemens had pitched 13 seasons in the major leagues by 1996, and had won 192 games and three Cy Young awards. Assuming his continued decline, Clemens would have been lucky to hang around for 4 or 5 more seasons and rack up perhaps another 50 wins. It's entirely possible that his resume -- 240 wins, the Cy Youngs, that truly dominant 7-year stretch -- might have been enough to earn a ticket to Cooperstown. But we'll never know. 

Instead, Clemens employed a steroid and PED regimen that turned him into the Barry Bonds of pitching: an other-worldly presence who defied not only age, but explanation. Until the truth came out, and the Baseball Writers decided that cheaters don't belong in the Hall. In the end, Clemens only has himself to blame. 

"It's Christmas, Theo, it's the time of miracles!"

Congratulations Coach Harbaugh. It's been a long time coming. The work isn't over yet, but you did something most of us thought would never happen.

GO BLUE!

 

Synthetic Debate

The second week of November not only brings us the latest College Football Playoff rankings but the inherent controversy around those standings. Perhaps even more so than the initial rankings, the CFP committee this week left some folks shaking their heads, with others shaking their fists. But might this be more of a "little c" controversy instead? 

The biggest point of contention this week centers around the state of Michigan: last week's #3 team, Michigan State, got clobbered by Purdue. The Spartans tumbled to #7, just behind... #6 Michigan! Yes, Michigan, the team that was previously unbeaten before falling to Michigan State the week before now sits ahead of them in the rankings.

This is a manufactured controversy. The committee viewed MSU's loss to Purdue, an unranked opponent, as a "worse loss" than Michigan's loss to an unbeaten, top 10 team in, ironically, Michigan State. But neither ranking on November 9th means anything.

With three weeks left to go before the conference championships, there is A LOT of football left to be played. Both Michigan State and Michigan still have to face the #4 team in the CFP, Ohio State. OSU figures to be heavy favorites in both games, so chances are good both Michigan teams will drop from the top 10 before the season is out. Should either prevail, they could potentially end up in the top 4 themselves.

Another point of "contention" is Alabama and their spot at #2. With one loss, the Crimson Tide has fans of unbeaten Cincinnati and Oklahoma crying foul. The Oregon and OSU camps have also raised questions about the Tide. But again: if things play out as expected, Alabama will face #1 Georgia in the SEC Championship. If Georgia wins, a 2-loss Alabama team drops out of the playoff picture. Should 'Bama prevail, they would likely rise to #1 and confirm the committee's perceptions. 

Less controversial, but still hotly debated, are those two previously mentioned unbeatens who can't seem to gain the respect of the committee: Cincinnati and Oklahoma. Though both the Bearcats and Sooners gained ground this week vs the initial rankings, neither cracked the playoff ceiling. 

Unlike the problems discussed above, these questions aren't as easily resolved. It's not hard to imagine both teams winning out and neither qualifying for the playoffs. While Cincy is vying to become the first non-Power 5 school to make the playoff, no unbeaten Power 5 conference champion has ever missed the cut. Could this be the year that the committee sends Oklahoma packing to the Sugar Bowl instead?

Again, so many games have yet to be played. The results of this weekend's games will factor into next week's rankings. Who knows what will happen on Saturday or what we'll be arguing about on Tuesday? The playoff committee knows this all too well.

Enough Is Enough Is Enough

As the old saying goes, "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." The next obvious question becomes, "How many times does Jim Harbaugh need to lose a big game before it becomes apparent that he's not a big game coach?"

The smoke has cleared following Michigan's latest failure, a 37-33 loss to Michigan State on Saturday, yet another excruciating Wolverines' loss at the hands of a bitter rival. To that end, here is just a sampling of the ugly numbers from the Harbaugh Era against top competition: 

• 3-4 vs Michigan State
• 0-5 vs Ohio State
• 2-13 vs teams ranked in the Top 10
• 1-4 in Bowl games

In spite of their 7-0 record and #6 ranking coming into this weekend, anyone watching the 2021 Wolverines closely could have seen Saturday's game coming. Against Rutgers, Michigan got a big lead early, failed to close them out, but held on for the win. Off to an early start against Nebraska, Michigan once again failed to put a team away, going so far as fall behind before eventually making a comeback. Michigan State, though, is simply better than those other teams. Up 16 in the 3rd quarter, Michigan couldn't put Sparty away. The Wolverines were outscored 23-3 the rest of the way.

This is Year 7 under Harbaugh. Since he took over, Michigan has employed three different Offensive and Defensive coordinators. Not a lot of consistency there, though Don Brown was a defensive genius for five seasons, until he wasn't. Josh Gattis was brought in to modernize the Wolverines' offense. Similar to Brown, offensive performance improved under Gattis, until late in the game when it doesn't. 

At this point, it's no stretch to think that Michigan could lose to a scrappy Penn State team on the road. Don't even think about competing against Ohio State. Should that happen, Harbaugh will have another 9-3 record before making the inevitable trip to the Outback Bowl to get beaten by Auburn. 

After the true disaster that was the COVID-shortened 2020 season, Harbaugh was given another chance to right the ship. Despite the 7-0 start, we're right back where we started. Michigan loses to top competition. Michigan loses to a big rival. Stop the insanity. Harbaugh needs to go.

Dogging the Dawgs

Don't get me wrong: the Georgia Bulldogs have the #1 defense in the country, by a lot. They are a ferocious bunch, having surrendered only 5 touchdowns in 7 games. It's not hard to see them arriving unbeaten to the SEC Championship game in December. In fact, perhaps only Florida will provide much of a test for the Bulldogs the rest of the way.

But before we anoint the Dawgs as national champs or even as a historic defense, we might want to take a deeper dive into those numbers. Specifically, exactly who has Georgia been stopping all season?

A quick check of their opponents tells the story. Here are the current total offense rankings for Georgia's seven opponents this season:

• #18 - Arkansas
• #30 - Auburn
• #76 - Kentucky
• #84 - UAB
• #114 - South Carolina
• #117 - Clemson
• #124 - Vanderbilt

Three of their opponents couldn't even crack the top 100 in offense. Two more aren't better than 75th. In fact, Arkansas was the only team Georgia played with even a top 20 offense. 

On average, those teams gained 373 yards per game, which would place them 85th in the nation. Take out Arkansas, the best offensive team the Dawgs have played, and their opponents' average falls to 356 yards, "good" for just 98th overall. Yes, Georgia shut these teams down. But it seems the rest of college football hasn't had much trouble with the likes of Vandy, S.C. or Clemson, either.

None of this is Georgia's fault. You play the teams on your schedule, and Georgia has absolutely dominated. Vanderbilt gained only 77 yards! Even as badly as those teams have moved the ball all year, their totals against Georgia were far short of their per game averages. But it certainly puts into perspective just how dominant a group the Georgia D has been.

All of this is a long way of saying: let's wait and see. More than likely, Georgia will face Alabama in the SEC Championship game. As of this week, the Crimson Tide has the 10th-best offense in the nation, averaging almost 500 yards per game. Alabama will be far-and-away the biggest test of the Georgia defense. 

Should the Dawgs get past the Tide, the College Football playoffs would await. So might a date with history. Or perhaps a date with Ohio State, the nation's top ranked-offense. As much as I hate both teams, that could be one helluva title game.

Simple Math

The 2021 baseball season is winding down, but the playoff races are heating up! As of this morning, the Yankees hold a 1/2-game lead on the Blue Jays for the second A.L. Wildcard. The Yanks are also 2 games behind the Red Sox, who would own the first Wildcard spot. The Yanks and Sox have 9 games left to play this season, while the Blue Jays have 10 on the schedule.

Who will win enough games to qualify for the post-season? Let's dig into the playoff math.

YANKEES

The Yankees play three games each against the Red Sox, Blue Jays and Rays, the first two series on the road. The first thing that jumps out at you are the records: all three opponents are playoff contenders, well above .500 on the season. The optimist says that the Yankees have their fate in their hands: beat the teams ahead of you and move up in the standings. The realist looks at the head-to-head results and doesn't like what they show:

• 6-10 vs Boston
• 6-10 vs Toronto
• 7-9 vs Tampa Bay

Of the three teams fighting it out, New York has by far the toughest schedule.

BOSTON

Once they finish up with the Yankees at home, the Sox finish the season on the road... but against Baltimore and Washington. At 48-104, the Orioles have the worst record in baseball. Though the Nationals have played better of late, they aren't a very good team. They have also struggled mightily against .500 teams, going 29-56. It would be hard to see the Red Sox losing too many games past the Yankee series.

TORONTO

The Blue Jays will play 10 games, one more than the other two. Fortunately for them, they get the Twins four times, yet another cellar-dweller. The Jays will then face the Yankees and finish out the season at home against the aforementioned Orioles. Like Boston, the Jays don't face much competition beyond the Yankees for the rest of the way.

Like the saying goes, the games aren't played on paper. Anything can, and will, happen on the field. But you ignore the data at your peril. The Yankees are 19-29 against their remaining opponents. Boston and Toronto are a combined 45-22 against the teams they will face, including the Yankees. As had been said before, the baseball season is long enough to separate the contenders from the pretenders. The simple math says the Yankees will be watching the playoffs at home this October.

Will the Real Slim Shady Please Stand Up?

Compared to all other sports, the baseball season is long. So long, in fact, that over 162 games, the season takes into account all the highs and lows, the streaks, and the slumps. The Yankees won 13 games in a row not long ago, then somehow pivoted into a 2-11 free-fall. Those 26 games taken as a whole work out to 15-11. A record of 15-11 doesn't sound all that special. But over an entire season, if a team won 15 of every 26 games they played, they'd finish with 93 wins. Cream rises, while the flukes usually sink.

The 2021 Yankees aren't a 93-win team. Of course, they're not really a 2-11 terrible team, either. The truth of the Yankees lies somewhere in between. Their record is akin to how they play: all-or-nothing, swing-and-miss but sometimes connect. Pitch well for a while, but maybe blow the lead, the save, or the game. I like to say they are “consistently inconsistent”.

In the end, they are the hallmark of the Brian Cashman era:

• Play well enough to appear competitive

• Win just enough to keep the stadium coffers full

• Do just enough to make it look like you know what you're doing

• Fail against better competition in the playoffs

• Repeat for 20 years

It remains to be seen what the Yankees will do over the final 21 games of the season. As of this morning, they would qualify for the 2nd Wildcard and a date with Boston at Fenway Park. But with another loss to the Mets and a Blue Jays win today, the Yanks would be out of a playoff spot.

Either scenario seems equally plausible. Less plausible is the idea that these Yankees will make a deep October push. The Sox, Jays and ultimately the Rays could be standing in their way. If that happens, if the Yankees make another early post-season exit, or fail to make it at all, will that be the final straw? Will Hal Steinbrenner channel his father in the name of winning? Will the Real Slim Shady please stand up?